Monday, August 28, 2023

Critical Self-Reflection

 A reflection on the documentary produced by my group will be included in this "Self-Reflection" blog post.


  1. How do your products represents social groups/issue?
  2. How do your products engage with audiences?
  3. How did your research inform your products and the way they use or challenge conventions?

......................................................................................................................................................................

"Diet or Die" emerges as a significant endeavor within the realm of health expository documentaries, offering a crucial lens into the pervasive issue of eating disorders, particularly among teenagers. The deliberate choice to focus on this demographic, aged 13 to 25, was a calculated one, considering their heightened exposure to the omnipresent influence of the internet and social media applications on their daily lives. This demographic, being the most impressionable, stood at the epicenter of the very issue we sought to unravel. The portrayal of idealized body images and beauty standards in today's media landscape has proven to be both a catalyst and a perpetuator of the disturbing surge in eating disorders within our communities. It's disconcerting to acknowledge the role media plays in not only setting these unattainable benchmarks but also subtly coercing individuals into drastic dietary measures. The consequences, as we've discovered, are far-reaching and affect both genders, albeit with a notable skew towards females. In crafting 'Diet or Die,' we recognized the need for a paradigm shift in our approach. It was imperative to distance ourselves from the familiar narratives that the mainstream media often propagated. The incorporation of personal narratives and a mosaic of perspectives from individuals occupying diverse roles - models, therapists, and sports enthusiasts - was a conscious effort to humanize and contextualize this intricate issue. Through this lens, we sought to challenge the very stereotypes that society had inadvertently internalized. In hindsight, our aspiration was not merely to create a documentary, but rather, to initiate a dialogue. The aim was to resonate with those grappling with eating disorders, providing them with a platform to relate, to feel seen and understood. Equally, it was our hope that by presenting these multifaceted dimensions, we would enlighten a broader audience, fostering empathy and insight. It is in this spirit of critical self-reflection that we recognize the responsibility borne by media in shaping societal perceptions and behaviors, and the need for conscientious narratives that reflect the realities of those affected by eating disorders.

In examining our eating disorder documentary project, it becomes evident that our primary focus centers on the impressionable demographic of teenagers and young adults, particularly students and high-schoolers. The choice of our title, "What The Food; Breaking The Strings," underscores our intention to provoke curiosity and prompt deeper inquiry into the documentary's subject matter. Targeting Generation Z, aged 13 to 25, aligns with the recognition that they are more susceptible to the impacts of eating disorders. This susceptibility is exacerbated by their exposure to the entertainment industry, a facet of their lives that is often underestimated in its potential for engendering damaging effects. The pervasive influence of media in promoting narrow beauty ideals and the subsequent adoption of extreme dietary practices are significant contributors to the alarming rise in eating disorders within our communities, affecting both genders albeit with a pronounced skew towards females. To effectively convey our message, we've strategically employed visual elements such as dramatic lighting, tense music, and fast-paced editing, collectively shaping the documentary's tone. Emphasizing relatability emerges as a cornerstone strategy; fostering interaction and the creation of a supportive community provides a platform for audiences to share their stories, thereby enhancing engagement and generating buzz around our documentary. Drawing on Bulmer and Katz's Uses and Gratification Theory, we've discerned the varied motivations behind seeking out specific media products to satisfy individual needs and desires. Our documentary seeks to target surveillance, with the aim of cultivating greater awareness among audiences regarding the prevailing issues in today's youth, ultimately arming potential victims with the knowledge to navigate these challenges. The enigmatic allure of our thumbnail, bearing the title "Diet or Die," strategically invokes hermeneutic code (5 Narrative codes), sparking intrigue and inviting deeper exploration. In retrospect, this endeavor has compelled us to critically scrutinize not only the content and message we wish to convey but also the nuanced methods employed to engage and resonate with our intended audience, highlighting the profound impact that media studies can have on shaping public awareness and discourse surrounding critical social issues like eating disorders. 

In our pursuit to create a media product addressing eating disorders, we have meticulously drawn upon a foundation of extensive research. This research has been instrumental in diverging from the prevailing narrative in mainstream media, which often portrays eating disorders in a misleadingly positive light, ultimately perpetuating harm, particularly among the youth. Through a comprehensive review of existing documentaries across various genres, we have gleaned valuable insights that inform our approach, ensuring that our media product authentically encapsulates the message we aim to convey to our audience. Furthermore, our research has empowered us to strategically deviate from genre conventions, affording us the creative freedom to present our content in a manner that challenges established norms. We've also meticulously examined the critical elements that shape the introduction of our documentary, the broader context of mental health issues, the significance of thumbnail imagery, and the pivotal role of participants' experiences. This thorough analysis guides our efforts to elucidate the gravity of eating disorders within the social community, underscored by the sheer ubiquity and influence of popular social media platforms, which reach billions of users. In a deliberate move to underscore the severity of the topic, we have included disclaimers, urging individuals grappling with eating disorders to seek guidance from reputable resources. This strategic intervention not only amplifies the weight of our subject matter but also emphasizes our commitment to responsible and empathetic storytelling. Furthermore, our research has honed our understanding of the audience's expectations, particularly in the realm of health documentaries. By tapping into cultural touchpoints, such as Korean beauty standards, we endeavor to establish a relatable connection with our viewers, ensuring that our health documentary resonates on a personal level. This critical self-reflection underscores the transformative power of media studies, affirming that a well-informed, research-driven approach can significantly impact the effectiveness and resonance of our media product, ultimately contributing to a more informed and empathetic discourse surrounding eating disorders. 

Monday, August 21, 2023

Media regulation (government - FRIENDS)

 1. Should media companies be in charge of regulating their own content, or should the government have a bigger role in this, and why? 

2. How does government regulation affect what we see and hear in the media? Can too much regulation stifle creativity and free speech, or is it necessary for protecting the public? 

3. Do social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter need more rules and oversight, or should they be left to regulate themselves? How might this impact our online experiences? 

4. Should schools teach students media literacy? How might this help us better navigate the media we consume, and is it the responsibility of educators or individuals themselves? 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Whether media companies should independently regulate their content or if the government should assume a more substantial role in this matter. Advocates of media self-regulation emphasize that it preserves freedom of expression, allows for quick adaptation to trends, and mitigates concerns about censorship and bias. On the other hand, those supporting increased government involvement argue that it safeguards the public interest, promotes fairness and diversity, addresses emerging challenges like misinformation, and ensures accountability in content creation. Striking a balance between these perspectives is intricate, with some suggesting a hybrid approach that combines media guidelines with government intervention for significant breaches. The challenge lies in harmonizing individual freedom with the collective well-being of society while considering cultural, legal, and technological dynamics. 

Government regulation significantly influences the content we encounter in the media by shaping content standards, distribution, and accessibility. It can impact what is deemed appropriate or offensive, prevent monopolies, protect vulnerable audiences, and ensure accuracy in reporting. However, the balance between regulation and freedom of expression is delicate. Excessive regulation can suppress creativity, self-censorship, and diverse viewpoints, while the absence of regulation can lead to harmful content and misinformation. Striking the right balance is essential to safeguarding the public without stifling creativity and free speech, and this often requires nuanced approaches that consider cultural, legal, and technological dynamics. 

Tuesday, August 15, 2023

Dominion vs Fox News (Third party media regulation)

  • How effective is third party regulation? 
  • Why didn't US Law Section 230 apply? 
  • Should Fox News be held accountable? 
  • What are issues surrounding Freedom of Speech? 

Dominion vs Fox News 

Dominion (voting machine) is a company that provides election technology and equipment, including electronic voting systems and tabulators, to government jurisdictions. It gained attention after the 2020 US Presidential Election due to baseless claims and conspiracy theories about its role in alleged election fraud. Fox News is an American conservative news channel that has been a prominent player in the media landscape for many years. It has been involved in various controversies and debates related to its reporting, editorial stance, and its role in shaping public opinion. 

Sydney Powell and Rudi Giuliani are Trump's lawyer that told lies to the public and Fox News got sue because they knew it was all lies but they still show it through the media. 

Dominion filed defamation lawsuits against several individuals and entities that had spread baseless claims of election fraud and manipulation involving their voting systems. Some of these claims were propagated on Fox News and other media platforms. Dominion's lawsuits alleged that these false claims had harmed their reputation and business. They sought significant damages for the alleged defamation. In response to the lawsuits, Fox News and other defendants argued that they were reporting on claims made by others, rather than making the claims themselves. 

Tuesday, August 8, 2023

TikTok (Government media regulation)

 What are the difficulties of regulating media in the digital age? 


ByteDance owns TikTok, a short-form video hosting platform that competes with Douyin in mainland China. Videos uploaded by users are hosted there, and they can be from three seconds to ten minutes long. TikTok and Douyin have grown in popularity around the world since their debuts. Tiktok was released in 2018, two years after Douyin that was released in 2016. These two different app has several differences especially in their contents and regulations. Douyin has some regulations while TikTok has none and the contents in Douyin are mostly educating and cultural. Compare to TikTok that contains random contents and it's not as educating as Douyin. The regulations difference between both of the apps are also different. Douyin has some regulations for children under 14 years old; app is locked from 10pm to 6am, only 40 minutes per day, and promoted videos by the algorithm. While on the other hand, TikTok has no regulation at all which means that everyone can use this app freely. 

Douyin is definitely controlled by the Chinese government and if there are any unethical contents and the user can sue the business while on the other hand, TikTok, users cannot sue the business no matter what because TikTok is protected by the US Law Section 230. So instead of the app get banned, the user account will be banned. This regulations might be good for the business as they can still operate. However, the users need to be more wise in choosing the contents that they want to watch in TikTok. 

Some difficulties in regulating media nowadays is that so many people would just give fake information before signing up so that they can use the app freely without any strict regulations. Other than that, people nowadays also have so many access to get the contents they want by signing up through illegal site that are mostly free for the users and has no regulations. 

Monday, August 7, 2023

Social Media Regulation (US Law Section 230 - 1996)

 A media platform is not held responsible for the publicly generated content on its site. 

Section 230 allows platforms to moderate content without losing their immunity. 


KATIE HOPKINS 
Katie Hopkins is a British media personality who has attracted notoriety and created controversy for her outspoken and provocative views on a variety of themes, including politics, immigration, and social issues. She was permanently banned from Twitter in June 2020 for violating the platform's policies against hate speech and abusive behavior.

 Some of her more contentious words and actions include: 

1. Anti-immigrant remarks: Katie Hopkins has been extensively chastised for her strong anti-immigrant beliefs and her use of disparaging words to disparage immigrants and refugees. Her tweets and comments regarding immigrants provoked outrage and accusations that she was encouraging hate speech.

2. Racism towards Islam: She has made Islamophobic comments on social media and in her writing, which has led to charges of inciting hatred and discrimination. She has faced legal action as a result of her views regarding Islam.

3. COVID-19 misinformation: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Katie Hopkins made contentious and inaccurate claims about the virus and lockdown procedures. Her posts were chastised for disseminating false information and downplaying the severity of the pandemic.

Self-reflection

This is the critical self-reflection of my Component 3 Music Video production project.  (word count: 1689 words including intro)  Cambridge ...